Brand Relevance: Making Competitors Irrelevant

Brand Relevance: Making Competitors Irrelevant

Prius.  Whole Foods Market.  iPod.  Kindle.  Not only are these brands phenomenally successful – they are examples of product categories where competitors are nearly irrelevant, says branding guru David Aaker.  In his groundbreaking new book, BRAND RELEVANCE:  Making Competitors Irrelevant (Jossey-Bass/January 2011), Aaker shows how any company can use the “brand relevance” strategy to achieve long-term, competitive success. 

Brand Preference vs. Brand Relevance

Despite extensive reliance on brand preference strategies to win customers, companies must abandon this approach and focus on brand relevance instead, explains Aaker.  Pursuing a brand preference strategy means constantly striving to be faster, cheaper, and better than the competition – an endless battle where competitors quickly match eachother’s product improvements.  With brand relevance, the goal is to make competition irrelevant – to offer something so different and special that it creates its own unique category and customers don’t perceive that there are any alternatives to consider.  Detailed with more than two dozen case studies, BRAND RELEVANCE lays out the four key tasks required to attain brand relevance.

Finding New Concepts

“An organization can enhance the chances of creating a transformative new offering by becoming proficient in creative thinking,” writes Aaker.  In BRAND RELEVANCE, he explains how to foster organizational creativity.  For example, from deep observation of customers, P&G developed the Magic Reach device for use in cleaning bathrooms; from his wife’s frustration with managing the family’s finances, Quicken’s founder got the idea for Quicken financial software; and by questioning why non-customers weren’t biking, bike components manufacturer Shimano developed the “coasting” bike.

Evaluating a Concept’s Prospects

Companies must learn to identify those concept ideas that have the greatest potential to be game changers, Aaker says.  The three key questions to ask are:  Is there a market?  Can we compete and win?  Will a market leadership position endure?  BRAND RELEVANCE delves into the evaluation process – from the “rosy picture bias” which assumes customers will be as excited about a new offering as its corporate champions (illustrated by the high-profile failure of the Segway), to the “gloomy picture bias” which can mean the demise of a high potential project (P&G killed the development of what ultimately became Tide, and was only saved from this potentially huge lost opportunity by a single scientist who remained committed to the product).

Defining and Managing the Category or Subcategory

Creating and maintaining brand relevance demands a new marketing mind-set.  “It is not enough to manage the brand; it is necessary also to manage the perception of the category and influence what category people will buy,” Aaker emphasizes.  BRAND RELEVANCE explains how to define the category so as to differentiate it from others, appeal to customers, deliver benefits, and drive choice decisions.  The key to doing this lies in identifying the category’s key associations – such as functional benefits (Westin’s Heavenly Bed); aesthetic design (the translucent Apple iMac); customer involvement (Nintendo’s Wii); or personality (fashion retailer Zara’s fashion forward and trendy persona).

Creating Barriers:  Sustaining the Differentiation

Creating a new category can generate a marketplace in which there are no good alternatives – but for how long can this lack of competition be maintained?  The answer lies in the barriers created.  BRAND RELEVANCE identifies an array of different kinds of barriers – from investment hurdles to building difficult-to-replicate customer relationships.  Aaker explains how such diverse products as Dreyer’s Slow Churned Ice Cream (proprietary technology), Best Buy and its highly visible Geek Squad (credibility), and Pampers (relationship with customers through its baby care website) have used such barriers to prolong the relevance of their brands.

“Success today is not about winning the brand preference battle, but about winning the brand relevance war,” asserts Aaker.  “Understanding and managing relevance can be the difference between winning by becoming isolated from competitors or being mired in a difficult market environment where differentiation is hard to achieve and often short-lived.”  BRAND RELEVANCE provides the tools companies need to generate innovative offerings that can create long-term financial success.