Critical Thinking to Achieve Positive Health Outcomes: Nursing Case Studies and AnalysesISBN: 978-0-8138-1601-2
Paperback
388 pages
June 2009, Wiley-Blackwell
This is a Print-on-Demand title. It will be printed specifically to fill your order. Please allow an additional 10-15 days delivery time. The book is not returnable.
|
Download Title | Size | Download |
---|---|---|
Section 1: Importance of Using Standardized Nursing Languages in the Electronic Health Record |
||
1. The Electronic Health Record and Nursing: An International Agenda |
297.50 KB | Click to Download |
2. The Need for and Use of Standardized Nursing Languages (SNLs) for the Electronic Health Record |
844.00 KB | Click to Download |
3. What are we bringing to the table? |
268.00 KB | Click to Download |
4. Theoretical Explanations for the Importance of Using NNN |
1.14 MB | Click to Download |
Section 2: Understanding Accuracy of Nurses' Diagnoses |
||
1. Lunney, M. (1990). Accuracy of nursing diagnoses: Concept development. Nursing Diagnosis, 1 (1), 12 -17. |
||
2. Lunney, M., & Paradiso, C. (1995). Accuracy of interpreting human responses. Nursing Management, 26 (1), 48H-48K. |
12.30 MB | Click to Download |
3. Lunney, M., Karlik, B., Kiss, M., and Murphy, P. (1997). Accuracy of nurses’ diagnoses of psychosocial responses. Nursing Diagnosis, 8 (4), 157-166. |
||
4. Lunney, M. (1998). Where are we now? Accuracy of nurses’ diagnoses: Foundation of NANDA, NIC and NOC. Nursing Diagnosis: The Journal of Nursing Language and Classification, 9, 83-85. |
||
5. Levin, R., Lunney, M. & Krainovich-Miller, B. (2005). . |
||
6. Lunney, M. (2008). Critical need to address accuracy of nurses diagnoses. OJIN: Online Journal of Issues in Nursing. |
||
7. Evidence-Based Nursing (EBN) and Diagnostic Accuracy in Electronic Health Records (EHR) |
2.67 MB | Click to Download |
Section 3: Facilitating the Development of Intelligence and Critical Thinking Skills |
||
1. Critical thinking Concepts and Definitions (from Scheffer & Rubenfeld, 2000) |
25.50 KB | Click to Download |
2. Teaching Strategies to Enhance Aspects of Clinical Decision Making |
26.00 KB | Click to Download |
3. Summary of Findings from Women’s Ways of Knowing, by Belenky, Clinchy, Goldberger & Tarule, 1986. Adapted by Margaret Lunney, June 2005 |
32.00 KB | Click to Download |
4. Lunney, M. (2003) Critical thinking and accuracy of nurses’ diagnoses. International Journal of Nursing Terminologies and Classifications, 14 (3), 96-107. |
||
5. Lunney, M. (2008). Current knowledge related to intelligence and thinking with implications for the use and development of case studies. International Journal of Nursing Terminologies and Classifications, 19, 158-162. |
||
6. Lunney, M. Frederickson, K., Sparks, A., & McDuffie, G. (2008). Facilitating critical thinking in online courses. JALN: Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 12 (3/4), 85-97. |
126.95 KB | Click to Download |
Section 4: Helping Students and Nurses to Develop as Diagnosticians |
||
1. Lunney, M. (2006). Helping nurses to use NANDA, NOC and NIC: Novice to Expert. Nurse Educator, 31 (1), 40-46. |
11.43 MB | Click to Download |
2. Teaching NANDA, NIC and NOC: Novice to Expert |
2.90 MB | Click to Download |
3. Use of Health Promotion Diagnoses at Every Stage of Health and Illness, Lunney |
1.19 MB | Click to Download |
4. Theoretical Explanations for the Need to Use NANDA-I, NOC and NIC, Lunney |
2.00 MB | Click to Download |
Section 5: Developing Case Studies for Teaching, Testing, and as Research Tools |
||
1. Lunney, M. (1992). Development of written case studies as simulations of diagnosis in nursing. Nursing Diagnosis, 3 (1), 23-29. |
||
2. Development of Valid and Reliable Case Studies for Teaching, Diagnostic Reasoning, and Other Purposes |
954.50 KB | Click to Download |
Section 6: Research Methods and Studies |
||
1. Lunney, M. (1992). Divergent productive thinking factors and accuracy of nursing diagnoses. Research in Nursing & Health, 15, 303-311. |
||
2. Redes, S., & Lunney, M. (1997). Validation by school nurses of the Nursing Intervention Classification for computer software. Computers in Nursing, 15 (6), 333-338. |
13.34 MB | Click to Download |
3. Carlson-Catalano, J., Lunney, M., Paradiso, C., Bruno, J., Luise, B.K., Martin, T., Massoni, M., & Pachter, S. (1998). Clinical validation of ineffective breathing pattern, ineffective airway clearance and impaired gas exchange. IMAGE: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 30, 243-248. |
||
4. Parker, L & Lunney, M. (1998). Moving beyond content validation of nursing diagnoses. Nursing Diagnosis: The Journal of Nursing Language and Classification, 9 (4), 144-150. |
||
5. Lunney, M. (2008). Need for international nursing diagnosis research and a theoretical framework. International Journal of Nursing Terminologies and Classifications., 19, 28-34. |
||
6. Feasibility of Studying the Effects of using Nanda, NIC and NOC on Health outcomes |
301.50 KB | Click to Download |
7. Nurses’ use of standard terms in an electronic health record, with and without NNN |
580.00 KB | Click to Download |
8. Consensus Validation Results: NANDA, NIC and NOC Categories for Long Term Care of People with Traumatic Brain Injuries |
1.52 MB | Click to Download |
9. Carlson, J. (2006). Consensus Validation Process: A Standardized Research Method to Identify and Link Relevant NNN Terms for Professional Practice. |
806.00 KB | Click to Download |
10. Evidenced-based Nursing |
288.00 KB | Click to Download |
11. Evidence Based Nursing (EBN) & Diagnostic Accuracy |
506.00 KB | Click to Download |
12. Participant Action Research with Nurses to Identify NANDA, NIC, NOC Categories for Care of People with Diabetes and Women in Labor |
2.33 MB | Click to Download |
13. Importance of Nursing Diagnosis Research |
3.78 MB | Click to Download |