The Data Model Resource Book, Volume 1: A Library of Universal Data Models for All Enterprises, Revised EditionISBN: 978-0-471-38023-8
Paperback
560 pages
March 2001
|
Do you think you've discovered an error in this book? Please check the list of errata below to see if we've already addressed the error. If not, please submit the error via our Errata Form. We will attempt to verify your error; if you're right, we will post a correction below.
Chapter | Page | Details | Date | Print Run |
---|---|---|---|---|
10 | 2nd to last paragraph, last sentence Change from: For example, each INFORMATION ORGANIZATION Change to: For example, each INFORMAL ORGANIZATION |
|||
56 | 2nd paragraph with the Contact Mechanism Purpose section, first sentence Change from: ... each PARTY CONTACT MECHANISM must have Change to: ... each PARTY CONTACT MECHANISM may have |
|||
86 | 1st paragraph, first sentence Change from: The ITEM VARIANCE entity ... Change to: The INVENTORY ITEM VARIANCE entity ... |
|||
110 | 2nd paragraph, last sentence Change from: ORDER ITEM that is for a product feature that is ordered for an ORDER ITEM that is for a product feature. Change to: ORDER ITEM that is for a product to an ORDER ITEM that is for a product feature, which is ordered for the former. |
|||
134 | First paragraph Change from: This entity would maintain which SALES ORDER ITEMs fulfilled which REQUIREMENT ITEMs ... It would also maintain which PURCHASE ORDER ITEMs are fulfilled by the REQUIREMENT ITEMs Change to: This entity would maintain which SALES ORDER ITEMs fulfilled which REQUIREMENT ... It would also maintain which PURCHASE ORDER ITEMs are fulfilled by the REQUIREMEN |
|||
145 | Third paragraph with the Agreement Definition section, first sentence Change from: ADDENDUMs modify the agreement Change to: ADDENDUMs (see Figure 4.13) modify the agreement |
|||
171 | 2nd paragraph, after 4th sentence Change to: After the 4th sentence that ends with "that stores the details of the receipt.", insert the following sentence: However, the SHIPMENT PACKAGE may exist without having a SHIPMENT RECEIPT, for instance on outgoing shipments when the organization assembles something into a package. So there is only a mandatory relationship from SHIOPMENT RECEIPT to SHIPMENT PACKAGE. |
|||
243 | Model 7.4 Invoice Status and Terms In diagram 7.4 in INVOICE ITEM entity, attribute "unit price" should be changed to "amount" |
|||
246 | Model 7.5 Billing for Shipment items Billing for Shipment items, Figure 7.5 Relationship names from and to SHIPMENT ITEM BILLING should be changed. Change the relationship names: - from SHIPMENT ITEM to SHIPMENT ITEM BILLING to "billed via" - from SHIPMENT ITEM BILLING to SHIPMENT ITEM to "of" SHIPMENT ITEM BILLING to INVOICE ITEM to "for" INVOICE ITEM to SHIPMENT ITEM BILLING to "the billing for" |
|||
250 | Model 7.7 Billing for order items Billing for order items, Figure 7.7 Relationship names from and to ORDER ITEM BILLING should be changed. Changed the relationship names: - from ORDER ITEM to ORDER ITEM BILLING to "billed via" - from ORDER ITEM BILLING to ORDER ITEM to "of" ORDER ITEM BILLING to INVOICE ITEM to "for" INVOICE ITEM to ORDER ITEM BILLING to "the billing for" |
|||
271 | Accounting transaction details diagram, figure 8.3a--Relationship should be mandatory Relationship from ACCOUNTING TRANSACTION to the TRANSACTION DETAIL shows a dotted line and therefore that it is optional. Relationship from ACCOUNTING TRANSACTION to the TRANSACTION DETAIL should be mandatory in both directions and therefore it should be a solid line all the way across. |
|||
271 | Accounting transaction details diagram, Figure 8.3a--Recursive relationship error The recursive relationship around the TRANSACTION DETAIL is shown incorrectly as a solid line. The recursive relationship around the TRANSACTION DETAIL should be optional and therefore be a dotted line throughout the line. |
|||
271 | Accounting transaction details diagram, Figure 8.3a--Relationship name missing The relationship from ORGANIZATION GL ACCOUNT to TRANSACTION DETAIL does not have a relationship name. The relationship name from ORGANIZATION GL ACCOUNT to TRANSACTION DETAIL should be "associated with". |
|||
277 | Accounting transaction details diagram, figure 8.3b--Relationship should be mandatory Relationship from ACCOUNTING TRANSACTION to the TRANSACTION DETAIL shows a dotted line and therefore that it is optional. Relationship from ACCOUNTING TRANSACTION to the TRANSACTION DETAIL should be mandatory in both directions and therefore that it should be a solid line all the way across. |
|||
277 | Accounting transaction details diagram, Figure 8.3b--Recursive relationship error The recursive relationship around the TRANSACTION DETAIL is shown incorrectly as a solid line. The recursive relationship around the TRANSACTION DETAIL should be optional and therefore be a dotted line throughout the line. |
|||
297 | Overall Accounting and budgeting model, Figure 8.12--Relationship should be mandatory Relationship from ACCOUNTING TRANSACTION to the TRANSACTION DETAIL shows a dotted line and therefore that it is optional. Relationship from ACCOUNTING TRANSACTION to the TRANSACTION DETAIL should be mandatory in both directions and therefore that it should be a solid line all the way across. |
|||
302 | Error in Figure 9.2 Relationships from EMPLOYMENT are related to PERSON ROLE and ORGANIZATION ROLE Relationships from EMPLOYMENT should be to EMPLOYEE and INTERNAL ORGANIZATION |
|||
444 | Error in referece to table In the 2nd paragraph, first sentence, Table 15.13 should be Table 15.12 |
|||
485 | Error in PRODUCT CATEGORY ROLLUP attribute names PARTY TYPE ID MADE UP OF PARTY TYPE ID PART OF Should be: PRODUCT CATEGORY ID MADE UP OF PRODUCT CATEGORY ID PART OF |
|||
Appendix A | 485, 486 | Errata in text - Pages 485/486 (Appendix A) Currently Reads: PRODUCT INCOMPATABILITY Should Read: PRODUCT INCOMPATIBILITY |
26-Apr-16 | |
Appendix A | Logical Data Model Entities & Attributes, BUDGET ITEM entity, BUDGET_TYPE_ID The attribute BUDGET_TYPE_ID should not be part of the BUDGET ITEM entity |
|||
Appendix A | Logical Data Model Entities & Attributes, ORDER ITEM entity, BUDGET_TYPE_ID This attribute should not be in the entity ORDER ITEM. Delete the last line in the ORDER ITEM that shows BUDGET_TYPE_ID as an attribute. |
|||
Appendix A | Logical Data Model Entities & Attributes, BUDGET SCENARIO IMPACT entity, BUDGET_TYPE_ID This attribute should not be in the entity BUDGET SCENARIO IMPACT. Delete the line in the BUDGET SCENARIO IMPACT entity that shows BUDGET_TYPE_ID as an attribute. |
|||
Appendix A | Logical Data Model Entities and Attributes, BUDGET REVISION IMPACT entity, BUDGET_TYPE_ID This attribute should not be in the entity BUDGET REVISION IMPACT. Delete the line in the POSITION entity that shows BUDGET_TYPE_ID as an attribute. |
|||
Appendix A | Logical Data Model Entities & Attributes, REQUIREMENT BUDGET ALLOCATION entity, BUDGET_TYPE_ID This attribute, BUDGET_TYPE_ID, should not be in the entity REQUIREMENT BUDGET ALLOCATION. Delete this first attribute and its associated values of "yes""yes" and "id", and move the BUDGET_ITEM up to be the first attribute in this entity. |
|||
Appendix A | Logical Data Model Entities & Attributes, BUDGET entity, BUDGET_TYPE_ID The first column for BUDGET_TYPE_ID should be "no" since it is not part of the primary key |
|||
Appendix A | Entity FACILITY has missing attribute Entity FACILITY is missing the PART OF FACILITY ID attribute which does occur in Volume 2 . Need to add PART OF FACILITY ID attribute as part of the FACILITY just after the FACILITY row and the column values are "no" "yes" "ID" |
|||
Appendix A | Logical Data Model Entities and Attributes FINANCIAL ACCOUNT should show another attribute (another row) named FINANCIAL ACCOUNT TYPE ID with values of "no" "yes" "ID" |
|||
Appendix A | Logical Data Model Entities and Attributes The first attribute in FINANCIAL ACCOUNT TYPE should be FINANCIAL ACCOUNT TYPE ID instead of FINANCIAL ACCOUNT ID |
|||
Appendix A | 464 | Logical Data Model Entities and Attributes The word FINANCIAL ACCOUNT TRANSACTION is repeated for the field ENTRY DATE. This is not correct. The entity name should only be printed once for the first attribute. |
||
Appendix A | 464 | Logical Data Model Entities and Attributes Only the attribute FINANCIAL_ACCOUNT_TRANSACTION_ID should be marked "yes" for the PK column. The field FINANCIAL ACCOUNT ID should have "no" in the first column indicating that it is not a primary key. Also the field FINANCIAL_ACCOUNT_TRANSACTIONID should be FINANCIAL_ACCOUNT_TRANS_ID instead. |
||
Volume 1 CD-ROM | CD Error with "description" field REASON should have the "description" field as an attribute and not part of the primary key. |
|||
Volume 1 CD-ROM | CD Error with key for ORDER_ITEM_ROLE ORDER_ITEM_ROLE does not contain the order_item_seq_id as part of its key. ORDER_ITEM_ROLE should contain the order_item_seq_id as part of its key. |
|||
Volume 1 CD-ROM | CD Error: Missing attributes for AGREEMENT AGREEMENT table should have a "description" and "from date" attributes. Add "description" and "from date" attributes to AGREEMENT. |
|||
Volume 1 CD-ROM | CD Error with relationship from ORDER ROLE to ORDER ITEM ROLE Relationship from ORDER ROLE to ORDER ITEM ROLE is incorrect and should be moved. Was changed to a relationship from ORDER ITEM to ORDER ITEM ROLE. |
|||
Volume 1 CD-ROM | CD Error with relationship with INTERNAL ACCTG TRANS INTERNAL ACCTG TRANS should be related to INTERNAL ORGANIZATION and not PARTY ROLE. INTERNAL ACCTG TRANS should be related to INTERNAL ORGANIZATION and not PARTY ROLE. |